My Latest Book

 Modern medicine in the United States did not emerge from a single lineage of scientific discovery, nor was its dominance inevitable. Rather, it arose from a contested historical process marked by competition among medical traditions, struggles for professional authority, economic pressures, and the consolidation of institutional power. At the center of this transformation stands the American Medical Association (AMA), whose rise coincided with the standardization of medical education, the professionalization of allopathic medicine, and the marginalization of alternative healing systems that had long coexisted within American society.

The divisiveness that came to characterize American medicine in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries did not originate solely from disagreements over therapeutic efficacy. Instead, it reflected deeper structural tensions: who would define legitimate medical knowledge, who would control access to professional status, and which systems of healing would be recognized as authoritative within emerging institutional frameworks. As allopathic medicine increasingly aligned itself with laboratory science, university‑based education, and pharmaceutical intervention, other traditions—such as homeopathy, naturopathy, herbalism, and holistic medicine—found themselves excluded from the institutions that defined professional legitimacy.